Evidence
Every task carries the exact conflicting values and where each one came from — not a summary.
Savia turns an AI-flagged conflict into a task with its full evidence, routes it to a named reviewer, and records the decision as confirmed — never inferred, never guessed. We are building it on CareCompile first, our own clinical-intelligence platform: an automated review flags a conflicting protocol value, and it enters a queue where a named clinician records the verdict against a fixed sample. The queue is live; the first physician review is not finished, and we would rather say that than publish a number you cannot audit. If your team ships AI-assisted work and needs the same guarantee, this is what we do — for you too.
Is the conflict written down with its evidence, or does someone have to reconstruct it from memory?
PASSDid a named person decide, or did an aggregate score decide for them?
REVIEWIs that decision recorded permanently, so the next run does not repeat the same unresolved question?
PASSEvery task carries the exact conflicting values and where each one came from — not a summary.
One named person answers. Not a vote, not a threshold.
The answer is stored as human-confirmed, permanently distinct from anything a model inferred.
Every confirmed fact traces back to the task, the evidence, and the person who decided.
An automated review flags a conflicting or unconfirmed claim.
It becomes a task: the conflict, the candidate answers, the evidence for each.
A named person reviews it and records a decision.
The confirmed answer replaces the flagged one, traceable to who decided and why.