Evidence
Every task carries the exact conflicting values and where each one came from — not a summary.
Enterprise · Validation
When your AI finds something wrong, a named person confirms it before it ships.
Savia turns an AI-flagged conflict into a task with its full evidence, routes it to a named reviewer, and records the decision as confirmed — never inferred, never guessed. We run this today on CareCompile, our own clinical-intelligence platform: when an automated review flags a conflicting protocol value, a real person adjudicates it before it reaches a clinician. If your team ships AI-assisted work and needs the same guarantee, this is what we do — for you too.
Start a conversationEVAL / CO-042REGIONAL READINESS
01
Is the conflict written down with its evidence, or does someone have to reconstruct it from memory?
PASS02
Did a named person decide, or did an aggregate score decide for them?
REVIEW03
Is that decision recorded permanently, so the next run does not repeat the same unresolved question?
PASSNot a benchmark score
A record of who decided, and why.
Decision
One named person answers. Not a vote, not a threshold.
Provenance
The answer is stored as human-confirmed, permanently distinct from anything a model inferred.
Traceability
Every confirmed fact traces back to the task, the evidence, and the person who decided.
EVALUATION LOOP
How a finding becomes a validated fact.
Find
An automated review flags a conflicting or unconfirmed claim.
Task
It becomes a task: the conflict, the candidate answers, the evidence for each.
Confirm
A named person reviews it and records a decision.
Apply
The confirmed answer replaces the flagged one, traceable to who decided and why.